4.3 Article

Cerebral amyloid angiopathy in streptozotocin rat model of sporadic Alzheimer's disease: a long-term follow up study

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEURAL TRANSMISSION
Volume 118, Issue 5, Pages 765-772

Publisher

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00702-011-0651-4

Keywords

Streptozotocin; Intracerebroventricular; Cerebral amyloid angiopathy; Amyloid beta

Funding

  1. Deutscher Akademischer Austausch Dienst [A/04/20017]
  2. Croatian Ministry of Science, Education and Sport [0108253]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cerebral amyloid angiopathy is manifested as accumulation of amyloid beta (A beta) peptide in the wall of meningeal and cerebral arteries, arterioles and capillaries and is frequently found postmortem in sporadic Alzheimer's disease (sAD) patients. It is difficult to assess when and how cerebral amyloid angiopathy develops and progresses in humans in vivo, which is why animal AD models are used. Streptozotocin-intracerebroventricularly (STZ-icv) treated rats have been recently proposed as the model of sAD which develops insulin resistant brain state preceding A beta pathology development. Vascular A beta deposits in the brain of STZ-icv-treated rats (3 months old at the time of icv treatment) were visualized by Thioflavine-S staining, Congo red staining and A beta immunohistochemistry. Thioflavine-S and Congo red staining revealed diffuse congophilic deposits in the wall of meningeal and cortical blood vessels both 6 and 9 months after the STZ-icv treatment. Preliminary A beta 1-42 and A beta 1-16 immunohistochemistry experiments showed positive staining in blood vessels 3 and 9 months after the STZ-icv treatment, respectively. Results suggest that cerebral amyloid angiopathy observed 6 and 9 months after the STZ-icv treatment seems to be a continuation and progression of the amyloid pathology observed already 3 months following the STZ-icv treatment in this non-transgenic sAD animal model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available