4.3 Article

Phosphorylation of soluble tau differs in Pick's disease and Alzheimer's disease brains

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEURAL TRANSMISSION
Volume 116, Issue 10, Pages 1243-1251

Publisher

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00702-009-0293-y

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; Frontotemporal lobar degeneration; ERK; Phosphorylation; Pick's disease; Tau

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia
  2. Cambridge Brain Bank
  3. University of Sydney
  4. Judith Jane Mason & Harold Stannett Williams Memorial Foundation
  5. Australian Research Council
  6. Ministry for Science and Medical Research
  7. Deutsche Forschungsgesellschaft
  8. Medical Research Council [G9724461] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. MRC [G9724461] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) is a common cause of presenile dementia characterised by behavioural and language disturbances. Pick's disease (PiD) is a subtype of FTLD, which presents with intraneuronal inclusions consisting of hyperphosphorylated tau protein aggregates. Although Alzheimer's disease (AD) is also characterised by tau lesions, these are both histologically and biochemically distinct from the tau aggregates found in PiD. What determines the distinct characteristics of these tau lesions is unknown. As phosphorylated, soluble tau has been suggested to be the precursor of tau aggregates, we compared both the level and phosphorylation profile of tau in tissue extracts of AD and PiD brains to determine whether the differences in the tau lesions are reflected by differences in soluble tau. Levels of soluble tau were decreased in AD but not PiD. In addition, soluble tau was phosphorylated to a greater extent in AD than in PiD and displayed a different phosphorylation profile in the two disorders. Consistently, tau kinases were activated to different degrees in AD compared with PiD. Such differences in solubility and phosphorylation may contribute, at least in part, to the formation of distinct tau deposits, but may also have implications for the clinical differences between AD and PiD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available