4.7 Article

Space4time: Optimization latency-sensitive content service in cloud

Journal

JOURNAL OF NETWORK AND COMPUTER APPLICATIONS
Volume 41, Issue -, Pages 358-368

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnca.2014.02.002

Keywords

Cloud; Storage; Content distribution; Latency sensitive; Blocking probability

Funding

  1. National 973 Program of China [2011CB302301]
  2. A*STAR SERC, Singapore [102-158-0036]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nowadays, as cloud service is increasingly a commodity, some Cloud Service Providers (CSPs) make profit by providing content services, and play the more important role of delivering content to users. Providing content services presents new challenges for coordination between storage systems and network infrastructures, specifically for latency-sensitive applications such as voice, video, and terminal services. However, prior research has not applied collaboration techniques of storage and network inline to the request path for latency sensitive applications. In this paper, we propose a latency-sensitive content distribution mechanism, Space4time, for a real world system. We observe that operation is largely affected by the collaboration among end users, storage and networks in cloud. Meanwhile, dynamic request routing within the cloud is strongly coupled with content placement decisions when designing the mechanism. Based on blocking probability, we propose content distribution and request routing strategies that take as input storage and network traffic information. Our strategies enable us to balance storage capacity savings and network traffic for performance, as demonstrated in our YouTube trace-based simulation. Our evaluation shows that Space4time outperforms StaticScheme on average 22.3% for access latency improvement. With more sites, Space4time has a better performance due to reduced traffic. (c) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available