4.7 Article

The impacts of mobility models on DV-hop based localization in Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks

Journal

JOURNAL OF NETWORK AND COMPUTER APPLICATIONS
Volume 42, Issue -, Pages 70-79

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnca.2014.03.014

Keywords

Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks; Mobility models; DV-hop localization algorithm; Localization models

Funding

  1. Applied Basic Research Program of Changzhou Science and Technology Bureau [CJ20120028]
  2. Applied Basic Research Program of Nantong Science and Technology Bureau [BK2013032]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of JiangSu Province of China [BK20131137]
  4. Guangdong University of Petrochemical Technology's Internal Project [2012RC0106]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Localization is a fundamental issue in Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks (MWSNs). Several localization methods have been proposed, but the main idea in them was that some static anchor nodes together with statically deployed unknown nodes transmit beacons with their coordinates in order to help unknown nodes to localize themselves. Compared with static networks, although mobility would appear to make localization more difficult due to uncertainty of its nodes positions, it may bring challenges to sensor networks. In this paper, anchor nodes travel in three mobility models, i.e., Random Waypoint (RWP), Random Direction (RD) and Reference Point Group Mobility (RPGM). Mobile anchor nodes (MANs) and unknown nodes constitute an MWSN. We aim to quantify the influences of mobility of the anchor nodes in an MWSN on the DV-hop localization algorithm. We summarize mobility models from which three mobility models are chosen for studying, and discuss some evaluation criteria of localization algorithms. Finally, we present experimental results and analyze effects by comparing results from simulations in static environments with those in mobile environments. 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available