4.2 Article

Heart Rate Variability and the Anxious Client Cardiac Autonomic and Behavioral Associations With Therapeutic Alliance

Journal

JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE
Volume 202, Issue 8, Pages 613-619

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000163

Keywords

Therapeutic alliance; heart rate variability; anxiety; autonomic nervous system; physiology; therapy; Working Alliance Inventory

Funding

  1. Department of Medical and Molecular Biosciences, Science, University of Technology, Sydney

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This exploratory study was designed to investigate the link between a client's heart rate variability (HRV) and the forming of a therapeutic alliance (TA) during psychotherapy. Change in HRV is associated with many psychological and physiological situations, including cardiac mortality. Cardiac effects were evaluated during therapy in 30 symptomatically anxious clients using HRV during six weekly 1-hour therapy sessions (S1-S6). Therapeutic index (TI), a measure of TA, was evaluated using skin conductance resonance between client and therapist. The Working Alliance Inventory provides a subjective measure of TA. State and trait anxiety and mood states were also assessed. Most HRV parameters were highest during S4. The sympathovagal balance was highest in S1 but stabilized after S2. In S4, TI was linked to high HRV parameters. Overall higher anxiety levels seem to be associated to lower HRV parameters. Conversely, in S4, high HRV parameters were linked to higher mood scores. This study found that a subjective measure of TA contradicted the physiological outcome. Results suggest that physiological data collected during therapy are a more accurate barometer of TA forming. These research findings suggest a need for further research identifying physiological markers in clients with a variety of mental health disorders over long-term therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available