4.2 Article

A Critique of the DSM-5 Field Trials

Journal

JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE
Volume 200, Issue 6, Pages 517-519

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e318257c699

Keywords

DSM-5; field trials; diagnosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article provides an overview and critique of the field trials for the current revision of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5). The purpose of the DSM-5 field trials was to evaluate the use, feasibility, safety, reliability, and validity of the DSM-5 proposals. In this article, the procedures for evaluating these properties of the DSM-5 are reviewed, and several concerns-such as delays, disorganization, missed deadlines, field trial cancelations, lack of adequate validity testing, and high clinician attrition rates-and their likely impact on the field trial results are presented.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available