4.7 Article

Evidence for the Analgesic Activity of Resveratrol in Acute Models of Nociception in Mice

Journal

JOURNAL OF NATURAL PRODUCTS
Volume 76, Issue 1, Pages 13-21

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/np300529x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. CAPES (Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior)
  2. CAPES
  3. CAPES-AUX-PE Toxinologia
  4. CNPq
  5. PUCRS
  6. FINEP research grant Implantacao, Modernizacao e Qualificacao de Estrutura de Pesquisa da PUCRS (PUCRSIN-FRA) [01.11.0014-00]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effects of trans-resveratrol (1) were evaluated in acute nociception models induced by capsaicin or glutamate in mice, in an attempt to further characterize its mechanism of action. The oral administration of 1 (50 and 100 mg/kg) reduced significantly the licking behavior elicited by capsaicin (1.6 mu g/paw) or glutamate (10 mu mol/paw). The co-administration of 1 into the mouse paw (200 mu g/site) markedly prevented glutamate-induced licking, without affecting capsaicin responses. In addition, the intrathecal (it) injection of 1 (150 to 600 mu g/site) greatly reduced the licking behavior caused by capsaicin, but not glutamate. Similarly, the intracerebroventricular injection of 1 (300 mu g/site) caused a potent inhibition of capsaicin-induced nociception, while the glutamate responses remained unaffected. However, the co-administration of 1 (300 mu g/site) reduced the biting behavior induced by spinal injection of glutamate (30 mu g/site, it), leaving capsaicin (6.4 mu g/site)-induced biting unaltered. Notably, the oral administration of 1 (100 mg/kg) inhibited significantly the capsaicin-induced increase of c-Fos and COX-2 labeling in the spinal cord and COX-2 expression in the cortex, but failed to affect c-Fos and COX-2 expression in the glutamate model. This study has explored the effects of 1 in both the capsaicin and glutamate models, extending current knowledge on the analgesic effects of trans-resveratrol.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available