4.7 Article

Theoretical Calculation of Electronic Circular Dichroism of a Hexahydroxydiphenoyl-Containing Flavanone Glycoside

Journal

JOURNAL OF NATURAL PRODUCTS
Volume 72, Issue 3, Pages 327-335

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/np800146v

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. USDA Agricultural Research Service Specific Cooperative Agreement [58-6408-2-0009]
  2. NIH [AI 027094]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) was employed for theoretical calculation of electronic circular dichroism (ECD) of a hexahydroxydiphenoyl (HHDP)-containing flavanone. glycoside, mattucinol-7-O-[4 '',6 ''-O-(aS)-hexahydroxydiphenoyl]-beta-D-glucopyranoside (2). It identified the roles of the (2S)-flavanone and, (aS)-HHDP moieties in generating the ECD spectrum of 2 and provided theoretical evidence for the empirical ECD rules applicable to monomeric flavanones and HHDP-containing compounds. The experimentally observed high-amplitude positive Cotton effect (CE) around 240 nm in 2 is derived from the (aS)-HHDP chromophore, while the low-amplitude negative CE in the 260-300 nm region is contributed by both the (aS)-HHDP and (2S)-flavanone moieties. The linker glucosyl moiety has little effect on the overall ECD. It appears that the respective chromophores in 2 contribute additively to the overall ECD, and the empirical rules are applicable for configurational assignment. However, if an (aR)-HHDP chromophore is present, as shown in mattucinol-7-O-[4 '',6 ''-O-(aR)-hexahydroxydiphenoyl]-beta-D-glucopyranoside (3), the dominant role of the (aR)-HHDP and interaction between the (aR)-HHDP and (2S)-flavanone moieties in its overall ECD may be confusing when applying the empirical rules to experimental ECD interpretation. Thus, theoretical calculation of the ECD that quantifies the contributions and interactions of different chromophores is essential for the assignment of the absolute configuration of such molecules.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available