4.2 Article

Rigid Polyurethane Foam/Cellulose Whisker Nanocomposites: Preparation, Characterization, and Properties

Journal

JOURNAL OF NANOSCIENCE AND NANOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages 6904-6911

Publisher

AMER SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1166/jnn.2011.3834

Keywords

Rigid Polyurethane Foam; Cellulose Whiskers; Nanocomposites; Tensile Strength and Modulus; Yield Strength; Compressive Strength; Thermal Stability

Funding

  1. NSF [EEC-0332554]
  2. PSE Fellowship program at IPST@GT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Novel rigid polyurethane nanocomposite foams have been prepared by the polymerization of a sucrose-based polyol, a glycerol-based polyol and polymeric diphenylmethane diisocyanate in the presence of cellulose whiskers. Varying amounts of sulfuric acid hydrolyzed cellulose whiskers (0.25, 0.50, 0.75 and 1.00 wt%) prepared from a commercial fully bleached softwood kraft pulp were incorporated to investigate the effect of its dosage on the mechanical and thermal properties of polyurethane nanocomposites. Fourier transform infrared spectra of the nanocomposite foams suggested that additional hydrogen bonds were developed and crosslinking occurred between the hydroxyl groups of cellulose whiskers and isocyanate groups which increased the phase separation of soft and hard segments in the polyurethane. The closed cells of control foam and nanocomposite foams were homogeneously dispersed and the cell sizes were approximately 350 mu m in diameter as observed by scanning electron microscope. A substantial improvement of mechanical properties at low whisker content (<= 1.00 wt%) was obtained, especially the compressive strength and modulus at 1.00 wt% whiskers content which were increased by 269.7% and 210.0%, respectively. Thermal stability of the nanocomposites was also enhanced as determined by differential scanning calorimetry and thermogravimetric analysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available