4.4 Article

Interlaboratory comparison of size measurements on nanoparticles using nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA)

Journal

JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH
Volume 15, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11051-013-2101-8

Keywords

Nanoparticle; Interlaboratory comparison; Reproducibility; Polydispersity; Toxicology; Health and safety implications

Funding

  1. CAN project (European Regional Development Fund through the Ireland Wales Programme
  2. NAMDIATREAM project (FP7 LSP) [246479]
  3. MULTIFUN project (FP7 LSP) [262493]
  4. European Union Seventh Framework Programme [FP7/2007-2013, 263215]
  5. Competence Centre for Materials Science and Technology Foundation (CCMX) of the Swiss Government (VIGO) [350601]
  6. NanEAU II [FNR/10/SR/825684]
  7. FP7-INFRASTRUCTURES-2010-1 [262163]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

One of the key challenges in the field of nanoparticle (NP) analysis is in producing reliable and reproducible characterisation data for nanomaterials. This study looks at the reproducibility using a relatively new, but rapidly adopted, technique, Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NTA) on a range of particle sizes and materials in several different media. It describes the protocol development and presents both the data and analysis of results obtained from 12 laboratories, mostly based in Europe, who are primarily QualityNano members. QualityNano is an EU FP7 funded Research Infrastructure that integrates 28 European analytical and experimental facilities in nanotechnology, medicine and natural sciences with the goal of developing and implementing best practice and quality in all aspects of nanosafety assessment. This study looks at both the development of the protocol and how this leads to highly reproducible results amongst participants. In this study, the parameter being measured is the modal particle size.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available