4.4 Article

Nanosized IrO2 electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution reaction in an SPE electrolyzer

Journal

JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages 1639-1646

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11051-010-9917-2

Keywords

Oxygen evolution reaction; Water electrolysis; IrO2 catalyst; SPE electrolyzer; Synthesis

Funding

  1. Mexican Council for Science and Technology (Conacyt) [Fomix-Zacatecas 81728]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nanosized IrO2 electrocatalysts (d similar to 7-9 nm) with specific surface area up to 100 m(2) g(-1) were synthesized and characterized for the oxygen evolution reaction in a solid polymer electrolyte (SPE) electrolyzer. The catalysts were prepared by a colloidal method in aqueous solution and a subsequent thermal treatment. An iridium hydroxide hydrate precursor was obtained at similar to 100 A degrees C, which was, successively, calcined at different temperatures from 200 to 500 A degrees C. The physico-chemical characterization was carried out by X-ray diffraction (XRD), thermogravimetry-differential scanning calorimetry (TG-DSC) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). IrO2 catalysts were sprayed onto a Nafion 115 membrane up to a loading of 3 mg cm(-2). A Pt catalyst was used at the cathode compartment with a loading of 0.6 mg cm(-2). The electrochemical activity for water electrolysis of the membrane-electrode assemblies (MEAs) was investigated in a single cell SPE electrolyzer by steady-state polarization curves, impedance spectroscopy and chrono-amperometric measurements. A maximum current density of 1.3 A cm(-2) was obtained at 1.8 V and 80 A degrees C for the IrO2 catalyst calcined at 400 A degrees C for 1 h. A stable performance was recorded in single cell for this anode catalyst at 80 A degrees C. The suitable catalytic activity and stability of the most performing catalyst were interpreted in terms of proper combination between nanostructure and suitable morphology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available