4.4 Article

Nanoparticulate-induced toxicity and related mechanism in vitro and in vivo

Journal

JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages 55-65

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11051-008-9447-3

Keywords

Nano- and micro-sized SiO2 and TiO2; Apoptosis; In vitro and in vivo; Nanoparticles; Occupational health; EHS

Funding

  1. CEFV (Center for Environmentally Friendly Vehicle)
  2. MOE (Ministry of Environment), Republic of Korea

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In urban areas, the quantity of exhaust particles from vehicle emissions is tremendous and has been regarded as the main contributor to particulate matter (PM) pollution. Recently, the nano-sized PM on public health has begun to raise the attention. The increased toxicity of nanoparticulate can be largely explained by their small size, high airborne concentration, extensive surface area and high content of organic carbon and transition metals. We have attempted to address the toxicity of nano sized-particlulate matter by comparing various particulates including micro-SiO2 (mSiO(2)), nano-SiO2 (nSiO(2)), micro-TiO2 (mTiO(2)), and nano-TiO2 (nTiO(2)) in RAW264.7 cells and in vivo. The cell viability of all particulates decreased dose dependently. 24-h incubation with nSiO2 demonstrated apoptosis in RAW264.7 using Annexin-V binding immunofluorescent microscopy, but not in any other particulates. In vivo, cytotoxicity of nanosized was higher than micro-sized particulates. As higher the concentration of particulates, the more pulmonary injury and neutrophilic infiltration were observed in nano-sized than micro-sized particulates, respectively. Particularly, 5.0 mg/kg of mTiO(2) never shows any increase of neutrophile even with high cellularity of total cells and macrophages. From these results, we suggested that particulate-induced respiratory toxicity be influenced by component, size, and dose of particulates including the characteristic nature of the target cells in vitro and in vivo.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available