4.2 Article

Genome-wide association study of warfarin maintenance dose in a Brazilian sample

Journal

PHARMACOGENOMICS
Volume 16, Issue 11, Pages 1253-1263

Publisher

FUTURE MEDICINE LTD
DOI: 10.2217/pgs.15.73

Keywords

1000 Genomes Project; Brazilians; CYP2C9; extreme discordant phenotypes; genome-wide association study; VKORC1; warfarin

Funding

  1. Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos (Finep) [01.08.01230.00]
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  3. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (Faperj)
  4. NIH NIGMS [R24 GM61374]
  5. Medical Research Council [MR/L006758/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0512-10064] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL092173] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  8. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R24GM061374] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  9. MRC [MR/L006758/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim: Extreme discordant phenotype and genome-wide association (GWA) approaches were combined to explore the role of genetic variants on warfarin dose requirement in Brazilians. Methods: Patients receiving low (<= 20 mg/week; n = 180) or high stable warfarin doses (>= 42.5 mg/week; n = 187) were genotyped with Affymetrix Axiom (R) Biobank arrays. Imputation was carried out using data from the combined 1000 Genomes project. Results: Genome-wide signals (p <= 5 x 10(-8)) were identified in the well-known VKORC1 (lead SNP, rs749671; OR: 20.4; p = 1.08 x 10(-33)) and CYP2C9 (lead SNP, rs9332238, OR: 6.8 and p = 4.4 x 10(-13)) regions. The rs9332238 polymorphism is in virtually perfect LD with CYP2C9*2 (rs1799853) and CYP2C9*3 (rs1057910). No other genome-wide significant regions were identified in the study. Conclusion: We confirmed the important role of VKORC1 and CYP2C9 polymorphisms in warfarin dose.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available