4.2 Review

Uncovering drug-responsive regulatory elements

Journal

PHARMACOGENOMICS
Volume 16, Issue 16, Pages 1829-1841

Publisher

FUTURE MEDICINE LTD
DOI: 10.2217/pgs.15.121

Keywords

ChIP-seq; enhancers; gene regulatory elements; pharmacogenomics; promoters; RNA-seq; transcriptional regulation

Funding

  1. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [GM61390]
  2. National Institute of Neurological Disorders Stroke [1R01NS079231]
  3. National Institute of Diabetes & Digestive & Kidney Diseases [1R01DK090382]
  4. National Cancer Institute [1R01CA197139]
  5. Coordination of Improvement of Higher Level Personnel (CAPES-Brazil)
  6. Young Talent Attraction Fellowship-BJT from National Council of Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq-Brazil)
  7. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA197139] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  8. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [R01DK090382] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  9. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [U01GM061390, U19GM061390] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  10. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [R01NS079231] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nucleotide changes in gene regulatory elements can have a major effect on interindividual differences in drug response. For example, by reviewing all published pharmacogenomic genome-wide association studies, we show here that 96.4% of the associated single nucleotide polymorphisms reside in noncoding regions. We discuss how sequencing technologies are improving our ability to identify drug response-associated regulatory elements genome-wide and to annotate nucleotide variants within them. We highlight specific examples of how nucleotide changes in these elements can affect drug response and illustrate the techniques used to find them and functionally characterize them. Finally, we also discuss challenges in the field of drug-responsive regulatory elements that need to be considered in order to translate these findings into the clinic.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available