4.4 Article

High slope stability of diversion power system intake of Jinchuan hydropower station

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOUNTAIN SCIENCE
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages 1109-1117

Publisher

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11629-013-2418-x

Keywords

Jinchuan Hydropower Station; High slope; Excavation slope ratio; Stability

Funding

  1. Chinese National Natural Science Foundation [41072229]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering (Sichuan University) [201110]
  3. Key Laboratory of Hydraulic and Waterway Engineering of the Ministry of Education
  4. National Engineering Research Center for Inland Waterway Regulation (Chongqing Jiaotong University) [SLK2011B04]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The excavated height of the left bank slope of the diversion power system intake in Jinchuan hydropower station is about 160 m. The stability and safety of the slope during construction and its operation/utilization become one of the most important geological engineering problems. At the same time, it is also crucial to select a safe and economic excavation gradient for the construction. We studied the problem of how to select a safe and economic slope ratio by analyzing the geological condition of the high slope, including the lithology, slope structure, structural surface and their combinations, rock weathering and unloading, hydrology, and the natural gradient. The study results showed that the use of an excavation gradient larger than the gradient observed during site investigation and the gradient recommended in standards and field practice manuals is feasible. Then, we used the finite element method and rigid limit equilibrium method to evaluate the stability of the excavation slope under natural, rainstorm and earthquake conditions. The calculated results showed that the excavated slope only has limited failure, but its stability is greatly satisfactory. The research findings can be useful in excavation and slope stabilization projects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available