4.4 Article

Ventral Mesencephalon Astrocytes Are More Efficient Than Those of Other Regions in Inducing Dopaminergic Neurons Through Higher Expression Level of TGF-β3

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages 288-300

Publisher

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12031-008-9146-7

Keywords

Dopaminergic neurons; Astrocytes; Ventral mesencephalon; Neurogenesis; Transforming growth factor-beta 3

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2006CB500700]
  2. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [7021002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Being supportive cells for neurons in the central nervous system, astrocytes have recently found to be associated with neurogenesis. Ventral mesencephalon (VM) astrocytes were also detected being instructive for VM dopaminergic (DA) neurogenesis, but the underling mechanisms are still unclear. This research is to figure out whether VM astrocytes are more efficient than those from other brain regions in inducing VM DA neurons from their precursors and whether transforming growth factor-beta s (TGF-beta s) are the underlying molecules. We found that, compared with astrocytes preparations from striatum and hippocampus, VM astrocytes preparations displayed markedly higher efficacy in inducing DA neurogenesis. Besides, they also expressed higher level of TGF-beta 3 than those of two other regions. When TGF-beta 3 gene expression in astrocytes preparations was inhibited by its antisense oligonucleotide, the induction of DA neurons decreased to a similar level among these three astrocytes preparations. Thus, our experiment indicates that VM astrocytes preparations which contained highly purified astrocytes are more efficient in inducing DA neurogenesis than those from other regions. Furthermore, it also suggests that the regional differences are regulated by different expression levels of TGF-beta 3 in those astrocytes preparations from different derivations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available