Journal
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR MODELING
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages -Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00894-014-2503-2
Keywords
Nucleobases; Excitation energies; Coupled cluster methods; CC2; CCSD; CC3
Categories
Funding
- Orszagos Tudomanyos Kutatasi Alap (OTKA) [104672]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
In this paper, coupled cluster methods CC2, CCSD, CCSDR(3) and EOM-CCSD(T) have been bench-marked against CC3 for the transition energies of nucleobases. Beside presenting vertical excitation energies for about 30 singlet transitions of four molecules, the results are analyzed statistically and problematic cases have been discussed in detail. It is concluded that the mean deviation of the CC2 results is smaller than that of the CCSD. However, the latter seems to be more systematic, i.e. it usually overestimates excitation energies by about 0.2 eV but with somewhat smaller standard deviation. Unfortunately, with decreasing single excitation contribution in the wave function CCSD gives large error, which can not be corrected by the non-iterative triples methods CCSDR(3) and EOM-CCSD(T).
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available