4.4 Article

Halogen bond tunability II: the varying roles of electrostatic and dispersion contributions to attraction in halogen bonds

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR MODELING
Volume 19, Issue 11, Pages 4651-4659

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00894-012-1428-x

Keywords

Dispersion; Electrostatics; Halogen bonding; Noncovalent interactions

Funding

  1. Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, ASCR [Z40550506]
  2. Operational Program Research and Development for Innovations - European Regional Development Fund (MEYS of the CR) [CZ.1.05/2.1.00/03.0058]
  3. Praemium Academiae, ASCR
  4. Czech Science Foundation [P208/12/G016]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In a previous study we investigated the effects of aromatic fluorine substitution on the strengths of the halogen bonds in halobenzeneaEuro broken vertical bar acetone complexes (halo = chloro, bromo, and iodo). In this work, we have examined the origins of these halogen bonds (excluding the iodo systems), more specifically, the relative contributions of electrostatic and dispersion forces in these interactions and how these contributions change when halogen sigma-holes are modified. These studies have been carried out using density functional symmetry adapted perturbation theory (DFT-SAPT) and through analyses of intermolecular correlation energies and molecular electrostatic potentials. It is found that electrostatic and dispersion contributions to attraction in halogen bonds vary from complex to complex, but are generally quite similar in magnitude. Not surprisingly, increasing the size and positive nature of a halogen's sigma-hole dramatically enhances the strength of the electrostatic component of the halogen bonding interaction. Not so obviously, halogens with larger, more positive sigma-holes tend to exhibit weaker dispersion interactions, which is attributable to the lower local polarizabilities of the larger sigma-holes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available