4.7 Article

Inhibition of foam cell formation using a soluble CD68-Fc fusion protein

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR MEDICINE-JMM
Volume 88, Issue 9, Pages 909-920

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00109-010-0629-y

Keywords

Lipoproteins; Platelets; Macrophages; Foam cells; Atherosclerosis

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [GK 794, GRK 438, Sch 897/3, SFB-773 Z2]
  2. Transregio-SFB-19 Inflammatorische Kardiomyopathie
  3. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (BMBF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The appearance of lipid-rich foam cells is a major feature of vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque formation. The transformation of macrophages into foam cells results from excessive uptake of cholesterol-rich particles by scavenger receptors such as CD68. We cloned a CD68-Fc immunoadhesin, a fusion protein consisting of the extracellular domain of the human CD68 and a human Fc domain, and investigated the function in vitro. Specific binding of CD68-Fc to OxLDL with an affinity of 10 nmol/L was determined by surface plasmon resonance and increased binding to lipid-rich human and ApoE(-/-) mice plaque tissue. This was confirmed both by immunohistochemical staining of CD68-Fc-treated paraffin sections from human plaques and by ELISA-based quantification of CD68-Fc binding to human atherosclerotic plaque extracts. In an in vitro model of macrophage/foam cell formation, CD68-Fc reduced foam cell formation significantly. This was caused both by interference of CD68-Fc with OxLDL uptake into macrophages and platelets and by the inhibition of platelet/OxLDL phagocytosis. Finally, expression of metalloproteinases by macrophages/foam cells was inhibited by CD68-Fc. In conclusion, CD68-Fc seems to be a promising new tool for preventing macrophage/foam cell formation. Thus, CD68-Fc might offer a novel therapeutic strategy for patients with acute coronary syndrome by modulating the generation of vulnerable plaques.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available