4.5 Article

Structural basis for ligand recognition at the benzodiazepine binding site of GABAA α3 receptor, and pharmacophore-based virtual screening approach

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR GRAPHICS & MODELLING
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages 286-298

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmgm.2008.05.003

Keywords

Benzodiazepine receptor; 3D QSAR; Pharmacophore modeling (HipHop); Scaffold hopping; Message-Address concept

Funding

  1. Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi [CMM0017]
  2. CSIR, New Delhi

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Given the heterogeneity of GABA(A) receptor, the pharmacological significance of identifying subtype selective modulators is increasingly being recognized. Thus, drugs selective for GABA(A) alpha 3 receptors are expected to display fewer side effects than the drugs presently in clinical use. Hence we carried out 3D QSAR (three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship) studies on a series of novel GABAA alpha(3) subtype selective modulators to gain more insight into subtype affinity. To identify the 3D functional attributes required for subtype selectivity, a chemical feature-based pharmacophore, primarily based on selective ligands representing diverse structural classes was generated. The obtained pseudo receptor model of the benzodiazepine binding site revealed a binding mode akin to Message-Address concept. Scaffold hopping was carried out across multi-conformational May Bridge database for the identification of novel chemotypes. Further a focused data reduction approach was employed to choose a subset of enriched compounds based on Drug likeness and Similarity-based methods. These results taken together could provide impetus for rational design and optimization of more selective and high affinity leads with a potential to have decreased adverse effects. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available