4.7 Article

Dual effects of Metarhizium spp. and Clonostachys rosea against an insect and a seed-borne pathogen in wheat

Journal

PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Volume 72, Issue 3, Pages 517-526

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/ps.4015

Keywords

seed treatment; biological control; Fusarium culmorum; entomopathogenic fungi; mycoparasite

Funding

  1. Plant Biosystems Elite Environment at the University of Copenhagen

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUNDCrops are often prone to both insect herbivory and disease, which necessitate multiple control measures. Ideally, an efficacious biological control agent must adequately control the target organism and not be inhibited by other biological control agents when applied simultaneously. Wheat seeds infected with the plant pathogen Fusarium culmorum were treated with Metarhizium brunneum or M. flavoviride and Clonostachys rosea individually and in combination, with the expectation to control both root-feeding insects and the pathogen. Emerging roots were evaluated for disease and then placed with Tenebrio molitor larvae, which were monitored for infection. RESULTSPlant disease symptoms were nearly absent for seeds treated with C. rosea, both individually and in combination with Metarhizium spp. Furthermore, roots grown from seeds treated with Metarhizium spp. caused significant levels of fungal infection in larvae when used individually or combined with C. rosea. However, cotreated seeds showed reduced virulence towards T. molitor when compared with treatments using Metarhizium spp. only. CONCLUSIONSThis study clearly shows that seed treatments with both the entomopathogenic fungus M. brunneum and the mycoparasitic fungus C. rosea can protect plant roots from insects and disease. The dual-treatment approach to biological control presented here is consistent with the ideals of IPM strategies. (c) 2015 Society of Chemical Industry

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available