4.4 Article

Detection of IDH1 and IDH2 Mutations by Fluorescence Melting Curve Analysis as a Diagnostic Tool for Brain Biopsies

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages 487-492

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.2353/jmoldx.2010.090228

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH [R01 88041]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Novel mutations in the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1. (IDH1) and 2 (IDH2) genes have been identified in a large proportion of diffuse gliomas. Tumors with IDH1/2 mutations have distinctive clinical characteristics, including a less aggressive course. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate the performance of a novel real-time PCR and post-PCR fluorescence melting curve analysis assay for the detection of IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in routine formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues of brain biopsies. Using the established assay, we tested 67 glial neoplasms, 57 non-neoplastic conditions that can often mimic gliomas (eg, radiation changes, viral infections, infarctions, etc), and 44 noncentral nervous system tumors. IDH1 and IDH2 mutations were detected in 72% of lower grade diffuse gliomas and in 17% of glioblastomas. The IDH1 mutation was the most common (93%), with the most frequent subtype being R132H (88%). These mutations were not identified in non-neoplastic glioma mimickers and in noncentral nervous system tumors including thyroid carcinomas. The results of this assay had a 100% correlation with the results obtained by conventional sequencing. In summary, we report here the real-time PCR/fluorescence melting curve analysis assay that provides rapid and sensitive detection of IDH mutations in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues, and is therefore useful as a powerful adjunct diagnostic tool for refining histopathological diagnosis of brain lesions and guiding patient management. (J Mol Diagn 2010, 12:487-492; DOI: 10.23534/jmoldx.2010.090228)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available