4.4 Article

Whole Genome Amplification for Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization Using DNA Extracted from Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Histological Sections

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages 109-116

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.2353/jmoldx.2009.080143

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) is useful to assess genome-wide chromosomal imbalance, but the requirement for relatively large amounts of DNA can be a limitation, in particular for samples extracted from small tumor arms on paraffin sections. Whole genome amplification (WGA) can be performed before array CGH to obtain sufficient DNA, but the possibility of artifacts attributable to biased amplification cannot be excluded. We optimized die WGA protocol to generate sufficient DNA with minimum amplification bias. Using formalln-fixed, paraffin-embedded histological sections of tumors carrying known TP53 mutations, LOH 1p, LOH 10q, LOH 19q, and EGFR amplification, we first optimized die protocol so that these genetic alterations were detected after WGA. We found that it ligation step before WGA is important because it allows a short reaction time with Phi29 to generate WGA-DNA with greatly decreased amplification bias. Using template > 150 ng of DNA, a ligation step before WGA, and a short reaction time with Phi29 DNA polymerase (< 1.5 hours), we obtained WGA-DNA (>4 mu g) with minimum amplificatiotion bias (less than threefold). Using this protocol, we performed array CGH (Agilent 105K) before and after WGA. Pearson correlation analysis Indicated a significant positive correlation in array CGH results between DNA before and after WGA (P < 0.0001). These results suggest that genetic analyses are possible using WGA-DNA extracted from paraffin sections, but that they should be performed with a carefully optimized and controlled protocol. (J Mol Diagn 2009, 11-109-116; DOI- 10.2353/jmoldx.2009.080143)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available