4.0 Article

Contribution of both catalytic constant and Michaelis constant to CALB enantioselectivity: Use of FEP calculations for prediction studies

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR CATALYSIS B-ENZYMATIC
Volume 76, Issue -, Pages 29-36

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcatb.2011.11.020

Keywords

Enantioselectivity; Enzyme catalysis; Free energy perturbation; Candida antarctica lipase B; Molecular modelling

Funding

  1. French ANR (National Research Agency)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Candida antarctica lipase B (CALB) is characterized by its stability and ease of production and is widely used in the pharmaceutical industry. Here we report on the enantioselectivity of the enzyme using both experimental and computational methods. The apparent kinetic parameters were first experimentally determined for enantiopure butan-2-ol and pentan-2-ol substrates. We demonstrate that enantio-preference for the R form of butan-2-ol arises mainly from a lower apparent K-M. This corresponds to a major contribution of Delta Delta G(ES), the free energy difference between the ES complex formed with the R and S enantiomers, to Delta Delta G(t), the free energy difference between both transit ion states, in comparison with Delta Delta G(kcat), the activation free energy difference. In the case of pentan-2-ol, we show that the enantiopreference for the R form conies from both a lower K-M and a higher k(cat). In addition, we used, for the first time, the free energy perturbation method to evaluate the free energy difference between tetrahedral intermediates formed with R and S alcohol enantiomers for a series of secondary alcohols. This is a valid model for Delta Delta G(t). Computational results were found to be in qualitative agreement with experimental data, and enable the determination of substrate orientation in the active site with fair confidence. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available