4.2 Article

Enhancement of photocatalytic oxidation of oxalic acid by gold modified WO3/TiO2 photocatalysts under UV and visible light irradiation

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR CATALYSIS A-CHEMICAL
Volume 327, Issue 1-2, Pages 51-57

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcata.2010.05.012

Keywords

TiO2; WO3; Composite photocatalysts; Gold; Oxalic acid; UV-vis light irradiation

Funding

  1. NATO [SfP 982835]
  2. National Science Fund, Ministry of Education and Sciences of Bulgaria [DO 02-252]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The photooxidation of oxalic acid, catalyzed by nanosized TiO2 or WO3 and composite photocatalysts: Au/TiO2, Au/WO3, WO3/TiO2, Au/WO3/TiO2 was studied under irradiation with UV, visible and combined UV-visible light. The catalysts were characterized by the XRD, XPS, SEM and TEM methods. The photocatalytic mineralization of oxalic acid, catalyzed by WO3/TiO2 or Au/WO3/TiO2, proceeded at a significantly higher rate under UV-A irradiation than that under visible light. This is due to the lower specific surface area of the WO3 and its small amount in the composite catalyst. Doping of the semiconductor materials with gold nanoparticles more than doubles the rates of mineralization of oxalic acid, compared to the un-doped samples, and more significantly in the case of Au/WO3/TiO2. The higher rate constants of oxalic acid decomposition under UV, visible or UV-visible light irradiation with the WO3/TiO2 and Au/WO3/TiO2 catalysts, compared with those measured with the individual oxide photocatalysts, are due to the more efficient separation of the electron-hole charges generated upon irradiation. Especially efficient is the charge separation in the case of the Au/WO3/TiO2 photocatalyst under irradiation with UV or combined UV-visible light, when the rate constants of oxalic acid destruction are approximately 1.7 times higher than that of the process catalyzed by Au/TiO2 and 3 times higher than that catalyzed by pure TiO2. (C) 2010 Elsevier By. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available