4.7 Article

Identification of N-Terminal Lobe Motifs that Determine the Kinase Activity of the Catalytic Domains and Regulatory Strategies of Src and Csk Protein Tyrosine Kinases

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 386, Issue 4, Pages 1066-1077

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.01.012

Keywords

Csk; Src; domain-domain interaction; kinase regulation; chimeric kinases

Funding

  1. American Cancer Society [RSG-04-247-01-CDD]
  2. National Institutes of Health [1RO1CA111687]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Csk and Src protein tyrosine kinases are structurally homologous but use opposite regulatory strategies. The isolated catalytic domain of Csk is intrinsically inactive and is activated by interactions with the regulatory Src homology 3 (SH3) and SH2 domains, while the isolated catalytic domain of Src is intrinsically active and is suppressed by interactions with the regulatory SH3 and SH2 domains. The structural basis for why one isolated catalytic domain is intrinsically active while the other is inactive is not clear. In this study, we identified structural elements in the N-terminal lobe of the catalytic domain that render the Src catalytic domain active. These structural elements include the alpha-helix C region, a beta turn between the beta 4 and beta 5 strands, and an Arg residue at the beginning of the catalytic domain. These three motifs interact with one another to activate the Src catalytic domain, but the equivalent motifs in Csk directly interact with the regulatory domains that are important for Csk activation. The Src motifs can be grafted to the Csk catalytic domain to obtain an active Csk catalytic domain. These results, together with available Src and Csk tertiary structures, reveal an important structural switch that determines the kinase activity of a catalytic domain and dictates the regulatory strategy of a kinase. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available