4.7 Article

DNA combing reveals intrinsic temporal disorder in the replication of yeast chromosome VI

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 375, Issue 1, Pages 12-19

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.10.046

Keywords

molecular combing; temporal replication program

Funding

  1. NHGRI NIH HHS [R21 HG003702, HG003702, R21 HG003702-01, R21 HG003702-02] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM068729-03, R01 GM068729-01A1, R01 GM068729, R01 GM068729-02, GM026108, GM068729, R01 GM026108-28, R01 GM026108] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is generally believed that DNA replication in most eukaryotes proceeds according to a precise program in which there is a defined temporal order by which each chromosomal region is duplicated. However, the regularity of this program at the level of individual chromosomes, in terms of both the relative timing and the size of the DNA domain, has not been addressed. Here, the replication of chromosome VI from synchronized budding yeast was studied at a resolution of similar to 1 kb with DNA combing and fluorescence microscopy. Contrary to what would be expected from cells following a rigorous temporal program, no two molecules exhibited the same replication pattern. Moreover, a direct evaluation of the extent to which the replication of distant chromosomal segments was coordinated indicates that the overwhelming majority of these segments were replicated independently. Importantly, averaging the patterns of all the fibers examined recapitulates the ensemble-averaged patterns obtained from population studies of the replication of chromosome VI. Thus, rather than an absolutely defined temporal order of replication, replication timing appears to be essentially probabilistic within individual cells, exhibiting only temporal tendencies within extended domains. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available