4.5 Article

Diversity and similarity of motor function and cross-bridge kinetics in papillary muscles of transgenic mice carrying myosin regulatory light chain mutations D166V and R58Q

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR CARDIOLOGY
Volume 62, Issue -, Pages 153-163

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2013.05.012

Keywords

Cardiac contractility; Cardiomyopathy; Myosin regulatory light chain; Elementary steps; Sinusoidal analysis

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [HL070041, HL108343, HL071778, HL090786]
  2. American Heart Association [10POST3420009]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mechanical properties of skinned papillary muscle fibers from transgenic mice expressing familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy associated mutations D166V and R58Q in myosin regulatory light chain were investigated. Elementary steps and the apparent rate constants of the cross-bridge cycle were characterized from the tension transients induced by sinusoidal length changes during maximal Ca2+ activation, together with ATP, ADP, and Pi studies. The tension-pCa relation was also tested in two sets of solutions with differing Pi and ionic strength. Our results showed that in both mutants the fast apparent rate constant 2 pi c and the rate constants of the cross-bridge detachment step (k(2)) were smaller than those of wild type (WT), demonstrating the slower cross-bridge kinetics. D166V showed significantly smaller ATP (K-1) and ADP (K-0) association constants than WT, displaying weaker ATP binding and easier ADP release, whereas those of R58Q were not significantly different from WT. In tension-pCa study, both D166V and R58Q mutations exhibited increased Ca2+ sensitivity and less cooperativity. We conclude that, while the two FHC mutations have similar clinical manifestations and prognosis, some of the mechanical parameters of cross-bridges (K-0, K-1) are differently modified, whereas some others (Ca2+-sensitivity, cooperativity, k(2)) are similarly modified by these two FHC associated mutations. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available