4.5 Article

Dynamics of heat shock protein 60 in endothelial cells exposed to cigarette smoke extract

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR CARDIOLOGY
Volume 51, Issue 5, Pages 777-780

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2011.07.003

Keywords

Cigarette smoking; Heat shock protein 60; Atherosclerosis; Autoimmunity; Live cell imaging

Funding

  1. Medizinischer Forschungsfonds Innsbruck (MFI) [4302]
  2. Austrian National Bank [12697]
  3. Austrian Research Found (FWF) [14741]
  4. ERA Network of Pathogenomics [818496]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Heat shock protein 60 (HSP60), expressed on the surface of endothelial cells (ECs) stressed by e.g. oxidized LDL or mechanical shear, was shown to function as an auto-antigen and thus as a pro-atherosclerotic molecule. The aim of this study was to determine whether cigarette smoke chemicals can lead to the activation of the HSP60 pathway. It was also our aim to elucidate the dynamics of HSP60 from gene expression to endothelial surface expression and secretion. Here we show for the first time that the exposure of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) to cigarette smoke extract (CSE) results in an upregulation of HSP60 mRNA. Live cell imaging analysis of a HSP60-EYFP fusion protein construct transfected into ECs revealed that mitochondrial structures collapse in response to CSE exposure. As a result, HSP60 is released from the mitochondria, transported to the cell surface, and released into the cell culture supernatant. Analysis of HSP60 in the sera of healthy young individuals exposed to secondhand smoke revealed significantly elevated levels of HSP60. Cigarette smoking is one of the most relevant risk factors for atherosclerosis. Herein, we provide evidence that cigarette smoke may initiate atherosclerosis in the sense of the auto-immune hypothesis of atherosclerosis. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available