4.5 Review

Paracrine mechanisms of stem cell reparative and regenerative actions in the heart

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR CARDIOLOGY
Volume 50, Issue 2, Pages 280-289

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2010.08.005

Keywords

Paracrine factors; Stem cells; Cardiac repair; Cardiac regeneration

Funding

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [RO1 HL35610, HL81744, HL72010, HL73219]
  2. Edna Mandel Foundation
  3. Foundation Leducq
  4. American Heart Association [10SDG4280011]
  5. Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Pavia, Italy
  6. Ministero Italiano dell'Universita e della Ricerca (MIUR)
  7. Ministero della Salute
  8. Fondazione Cariplo
  9. Fondazione Banca del Monte di Lombardia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stem cells play an important role in restoring cardiac function in the damaged heart. In order to mediate repair, stem cells need to replace injured tissue by differentiating into specialized cardiac cell lineages and/or manipulating the cell and molecular mechanisms governing repair. Despite early reports describing engraftment and successful regeneration of cardiac tissue in animal models of heart failure, these events appear to be infrequent and yield too few new cardiomyocytes to account for the degree of improved cardiac function observed. Instead, mounting evidence suggests that stem cell mediated repair takes place via the release of paracrine factors into the surrounding tissue that subsequently direct a number of restorative processes including myocardial protection, neovascularization, cardiac remodeling, and differentiation. The potential for diverse stem cell populations to moderate many of the same processes as well as key paracrine factors and molecular pathways involved in stem cell-mediated cardiac repair will be discussed in this review. This article is part of a special issue entitled, Cardiovascular Stem Cells Revisited. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available