4.5 Article

Regulation of heat shock protein 60 and 72 expression in the failing heart

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR CARDIOLOGY
Volume 48, Issue 2, Pages 360-366

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2009.11.009

Keywords

HSP60; HSP72; Heart failure; NF kappa B; ERK 1/2; GSK

Funding

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs
  2. NIH [HL077281, HL079071]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Heart failure, a progressive, fatal disease of the heart Muscle, is a state of chronic inflammation and injury. Heat shock protein (HSP) 72, a ubiquitous protective protein that is well-established as cardioprotective, is not increased in heart failure. In contrast, HSP60 levels are doubled in the failing heart. We hypothesized that HSF-1 is not activated in heart failure and that the increased expression of HSP60 was driven by NF kappa B activation. To test this hypothesis, we measured levels of heat shock factor (HSF) -1 and -2, the transcription factors controlling HSP expression, which were increased in heart failure. There was no increased phosphorylation of serine 230 or serine 303/307 in HSF-1, which are thought to regulate its activity; EMSA showed no increase in HSF binding activity with heart failure. Nonetheless, mRNA was increased for HSP60, but not HSP72. In contrast to HSF, NF kappa B activity was increased in heart failure. HSP60, but not HSP72, contained NF kappa B binding elements. ChIP assay demonstrated increased binding of NF kappa B to both of the NF kappa B binding elements in the heart failure HSP60 gene. TNF alpha treatment was used to test the role of NF kappa B activation in HSP60 expression in a cardiac cell line. TNF alpha increased HSP60 expression, and this could be prevented by pretreatment with siRNA inhibiting p65 expression. In conclusion, HSP72 is not increased in heart failure because HSF activity is not changed; increased expression of HSP60 may be driven by NF kappa B activation. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available