4.5 Review

Myofilament length dependent activation

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR CARDIOLOGY
Volume 48, Issue 5, Pages 851-858

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2009.12.017

Keywords

Frank-Starling Law of The Heart; Length-Tension Relationship; Sarcomere length; Regulation

Funding

  1. NIH [PO1-HL62426, RO1-HL75494, T32-007692]
  2. American Heart Association
  3. U.S. Department of Energy, Basic Energy Sciences, Office of Energy Research [W-31-109-ENG-38]
  4. U.S. National Institutes of Health [RR08630]
  5. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [P41RR008630] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  6. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL075494, T32HL007692, P01HL062426] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  7. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [P41GM103622] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Frank-Starling law of the heart describes the interrelationship between end-diastolic volume and cardiac ejection volume, a regulatory system that operates on a beat-to-beat basis. The main cellular mechanism that underlies this phenomenon is an increase in the responsiveness of cardiac myofilaments to activating Ca2+ ions at a longer sarcomere length, commonly referred to as myofilament length-dependent activation. This review focuses on what molecular mechanisms may underlie myofilament length dependency. Specifically, the roles of inter-filament spacing, thick and thin filament based regulation, as well as sarcomeric regulatory proteins are discussed. Although the Frank-Starling law of the heart constitutes a fundamental cardiac property that has been appreciated for well over a century, it is still not known in muscle how the contractile apparatus transduces the information concerning sarcomere length to modulate ventricular pressure development. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available