4.7 Article

Interpregnancy Interval and Risk of Autism Spectrum Disorders

Journal

PEDIATRICS
Volume 136, Issue 4, Pages 651-657

Publisher

AMER ACAD PEDIATRICS
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2015-1099

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Kaiser Foundation Research Institute
  2. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences [3R01 E5016669]
  3. National Institutes of Health (NIH)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether subsequent births after short and long interpregnancy intervals (IPIs) are associated with risk of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). METHOD: We assessed the association between IPI and ASD risk in a cohort of 45 261 children born at Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) between 2000 and 2009. Children with ASD were identified from International Classification of Diseases, Revision 9 diagnostic codes 299.0, 299.8, and 299.9 recorded in KPNC electronic medical records. IPI was defined as the time from the birth of the first child to the conception of the second child. Survival analysis and logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association between IPI and risk of ASD in second-born children. RESULTS: Children born after an IPI of <12 months or >= 72 months had a 2- to 3-fold increased ASD risk compared with children born after an interval of 36 to 47 months. Respective adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) were as follows: <6 months, 3.0 (1.9-4.7); 6 to 8 months, 2.1 (1.4-3.3); 9 to 11 months, 1.9 (1.3-2.1); 12 to 23 months, 1.5 (1.1-2.1); and >= 72 months, 2.4 (1.5-3.7). The results are not explained by maternal BMI or change in BMI between pregnancies or by parental age, maternal antidepressant medication use, or unfavorable events occurring during the first or second pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: Children born after interpregnancy intervals <2 years or >6 years may be at increased risk of ASD. The mechanism explaining this association is unknown, and more research is needed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available