4.3 Article

Towards correlative imaging of plant cortical microtubule arrays: combining ultrastructure with real-time microtubule dynamics

Journal

JOURNAL OF MICROSCOPY
Volume 235, Issue 3, Pages 241-251

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2009.03224.x

Keywords

Correlative microscopy; cortical microtubule; plant cell; electron microscopy; optical microscopy

Categories

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [A19905246]
  2. JCG [DP0557050]
  3. FABLS award for Emerging Research Projects
  4. Australian Postgraduate Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

P>There are a variety of microscope technologies available to image plant cortical microtubule arrays. These can be applied specifically to investigate direct questions relating to array function, ultrastructure or dynamics. Immunocytochemistry combined with confocal laser scanning microscopy provides low resolution snapshots of cortical microtubule arrays at the time of fixation whereas live cell imaging of fluorescent fusion proteins highlights the dynamic characteristics of the arrays. High-resolution scanning electron microscopy provides surface detail about the individual microtubules that form cortical microtubule arrays and can also resolve cellulose microfibrils that form the innermost layer of the cell wall. Transmission electron microscopy of the arrays in cross section can be used to examine links between microtubules and the plasma membrane and, combined with electron tomography, has the potential to provide a complete picture of how individual microtubules are spatially organized within the cortical cytoplasm. Combining these high-resolution imaging techniques with the expression of fluorescent cytoskeletal fusion proteins in live cells using correlative microscopy procedures will usher in an radical change in our understanding of the molecular dynamics that underpin the organization and function of the cytoskeleton.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available