4.5 Article

The Multi-Mode Resonance in AlN Lamb Wave Resonators

Journal

JOURNAL OF MICROELECTROMECHANICAL SYSTEMS
Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages 973-984

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JMEMS.2018.2867813

Keywords

Aluminum nitride; coupling coefficient; dispersion; Lamb wave modes; Lamb wave resonators; MEMS resonators; piezoMEMS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The characteristics of the multi-mode resonance behavior of AlN Lamb wave resonators (LWRs) are theoretically and experimentally investigated for the first time in this paper. Adler's approach and finite element method (FEM) are used to calculate the dispersive characteristics of the phase velocity (v(p)), group velocity (v(g)), effective coupling coefficient (k(eff)(2)), and temperature coefficient of frequency for the first eight Lamb wave modes with different transducer configurations. The FEM is performed to take an insight into the mode shapes of the S-0 mode and S-1 mode specifically: the S-0 mode is more contourlike and exhibits the largest k(eff)(2) when h(AlN)/lambda is close to 0.5; the S-1 mode is strong in vertical direction and can enable high resonance frequency (f(s)) and large k(2) simultaneously when AlN thickness is very thin. Experimentally, AlN LWRs with different AlN thicknesses are designed and fabricated. The measured results are fitted into the multi-resonance BVD model so that the device performance parameters, as well as the equivalent, lumped element values are extracted and compared. By choosing different normalized AlN thicknesses, the performance of different Lamb wave modes varies largely due to the dispersive characteristics and agrees well with theoretically predicted acoustic characteristics. This paper lays the foundation for characterizing the multi-resonance behaviors of AlN LWRs and gives guidance on choosing the optimal design parameters and Lamb wave modes for different applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available