4.4 Article

Growth Rate and Biomass Productivity of Chlorella as Affected by Culture Depth and Cell Density in an Open Circular Photobioreactor

Journal

JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages 539-544

Publisher

KOREAN SOC MICROBIOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.4014/jmb.1209.09047

Keywords

Chlorella; culture depth; cell density; growth rate; biomass productivity; shallow culture

Funding

  1. National Natural Foundation of China [CNSF31272680]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2012FY112900]
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KSCX2-YW-G-060]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effects of culture depth (2-10 cm) and cell density on the growth rate and biomass productivity of Chlorella sp. XQ-200419 were investigated through the use of a self-designed open circular pond photobioreactor-imitation system. With increases in culture depths from 2 to 10 cm, the growth rate decreased significantly from 1.08/d to 0.39/d. However, the biomass productivity only increased slightly from 8.41 to 11.22 g/m(2)/d. The biomass productivity (11.08 g/m(2)/d) achieved in 4 cm culture with an initial OD540 of 0.95 was similar to that achieved in 10 cm culture with an initial OD540 of 0.5. In addition, the duration of maximal areal productivity at a 4 cm depth was prolonged from 1 to 4 days, a finding that was also similar to that of the culture at a 10 cm depth. In both cases, the initial areal biomass densities were identical. Based on these results and previous studies, it can be concluded that the influence of culture depth and cell density on areal biomass productivity is actually due to different areal biomass densities. Under suitable conditions, there are a range of optimal biomass densities, and areal biomass productivity reaches its maximum when the biomass density is within these optimal ranges. Otherwise, biomass productivity will decrease. Therefore, a key factor for high biomass productivity is to maintain an optimal biomass density.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available