4.4 Article

Bacterial, Archaeal, and Eukaryal Diversity in the Intestines of Korean People

Journal

JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 46, Issue 5, Pages 491-501

Publisher

MICROBIOLOGICAL SOCIETY KOREA
DOI: 10.1007/s12275-008-0199-7

Keywords

human intestinal microbes; Bacteria; Archaea; Eukaryote; DGGE; UPGMA

Categories

Funding

  1. Environmental Biotechnology National Core Research Center (KOSEF) [R15-2003-012-02002-0]
  2. Korea Research Foundation
  3. Korean Government (MOEHRD) [KRF-2007-511-C00073]
  4. [BDM0200726]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The bacterial, archaeal, and eukaryal diversity in fecal samples from ten Koreans were analyzed and compared by using the PCR-fingerprinting method, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE). The bacteria all belonged to the Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes phyla, which were known to be the dominant bacterial species in the human intestine. Most of the archaeal sequences belonged to the methane-producing archaea but several halophilic archarea-related sequences were also detected unexpectedly. While a small number of eukaryal sequences were also detected upon DGGE analysis, these sequences were related to fungi and stramenopiles (Blastocystis hominis). With regard to the bacterial and archaeal DGGE analysis, all ten samples had one and two prominent bands, respectively, but many individual-specific bands were also observed. However, only five of the ten samples had small eukaryal DGGE bands and none of these bands was observed in all five samples. Unweighted pair group method and arithmetic averages clustering algorithm (UPGMA) clustering analysis revealed that the archaeal and bacterial communities in the ten samples had relatively higher relatedness (the average Dice coefficient values were 68.9 and 59.2% for archaea and bacteria, respectively) but the eukaryal community showed low relatedness (39.6%).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available