4.3 Article

Evaluation of viability-qPCR detection system on viable and dead Salmonella serovar Enteritidis

Journal

JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS
Volume 103, Issue -, Pages 131-137

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2014.06.003

Keywords

Propidium monoazide; Real-time PCR; SYBR (R) Green; Detection; Salmonella

Funding

  1. Ylieff grant from the Belgian Federal Public Service: Public Health Food Chain Safety and Environment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The propidium monoazide (PMA) coupled with PCR (viability PCR) is used in foodborne pathogen detection in order to detect only viable bacteria. Originally presented to fully remove the signal of dead bacteria, the limits of the viability PCR rapidly came out in the literature. In this study, the use of PMA in a viability-qPCR (v-qPCR) was assessed on viable and dead cells of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Enteritidis. The PMA treatment protocol was modified (dark incubation duration, concentration of PMA) to evaluate if a complete negative signal of dead Salmonella was possible. However, none of these modifications was found to improve the removal of the remaining OCR signal observed in the presence of dead bacteria. The present research also underlines that PMA may unexpectedly decrease the qPCR signal observed on living S. Enteritidis at low concentration. Finally, the use of S. Enteritidis cells killed by processes altering or not the cell-wall/membrane gives us a clue to answering the question about the non-total extinction of the signal of dead cells sample in the v-qPCR assay. Indeed, the data strongly indicate that the remaining qPCR signal observed in non-culturable cells does not only depend on the cell-wall/membrane integrity of the bacteria. According to these results, the authors suggest that for a rapid and reliable foodbome bacteria detection system, an enrichment followed by a qPCR analysis should be preferred to a v-qPCR. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available