4.3 Review

Sporulation studies in Clostridium difficile

Journal

JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS
Volume 87, Issue 2, Pages 133-138

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2011.07.017

Keywords

Clostridium difficile; Spore; Sporulation; BI/NAP1/027; Hypervirulent

Funding

  1. UK MRC [G0601176]
  2. European Community [223585]
  3. Morvus Technology Ltd.
  4. Medical Research Council [G0601176] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. MRC [G0601176] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Clostridium difficile is a leading cause of healthcare-associated diarrhoea. In recent years, certain C difficile types have become highly represented among clinical isolates and are associated with outbreaks of increased disease severity, higher relapse rates and an expanded repertoire of antibiotic resistance. Endospores, produced during sporulation, play a pivotal role in infection and disease transmission and it has been suggested in the literature that these so-called 'hypervirulent' C. difficile types are more prolific in terms of sporulation in vitro. However, work in our laboratory has provided evidence to the contrary suggesting that although there is significant strain-to-strain variation in C. difficile sporulation characteristics this variation does not appear to be type-associated. On analysis of the literature, it is apparent that the methods used to quantify sporulation in previous studies have varied greatly and sample sizes have remained small. The conflicting data in the literature may, therefore, not necessarily be generally representative of C. difficile sporulation. Instead, these inconsistencies may reflect differences in the experimental design of each study. In this review, the need for further investigations of C. difficile sporulation rates is highlighted. Specifically, the advantages and disadvantages of the different experimental approaches previously used are discussed and a standard set of principles for measuring C. difficile sporulation in the future is proposed. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available