4.2 Article

Comparative annealing effect on bonded wafers in air and ultrahigh vacuum for microelectromechanical systems/microfluidics packaging

Journal

Publisher

SPIE-SOC PHOTO-OPTICAL INSTRUMENTATION ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1117/1.3500747

Keywords

sequential plasma activated bonding; bonding strength; void; viscous flow; nanointerface; electron energy loss spectroscopy; sealing; chemical performance

Funding

  1. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada [327947]
  2. Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI) [12128]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The fundamentals of room temperature bonding methods-surface activated bonding (SAB) and sequentially plasma-activated bonding (SPAB)-are reviewed with applications for packaging of microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) and microfluidic devices. The room temperature bonding strength of the silicon/silicon interface in the SAB and SPAB is as high as that of the hydrophilic bonding method, which requires annealing as high as 1000 degrees C to achieve covalent bonding. After heating, voids are not observed and bonding strengths are not changed in the SAB. In the SPAB, interfacial voids are increased and decreased the bonding strength. Water rearrangement such as absorption and desorption across the bonded interface is found below 225 degrees C. While voids are not significant up to 400 degrees C, a considerable amount of thermal voids above 600 degrees C is found due to viscous flow of oxides. Before heating, interfacial amorphous layers are observed both in the SAB (8.3 nm) and SPAB (4.8 nm), but after heating these disappear and enlarge in the SAB and SPAB, respectively. This enlarged amorphous layer is SiO2, which is due to the oxidation of silicon/silicon interface after sequential heating. The bonding strength, sealing, and chemical performances of the interfaces meet the requirements for MEMS and microfluidics applications. (C) 2010 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers. [DOI: 10.1117/1.3500747]

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available