4.4 Article

A diffusion model account of criterion shifts in the lexical decision task

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE
Volume 58, Issue 1, Pages 140-159

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.04.006

Keywords

diffusion model; deadline model; lexical decision; response criteria; MROM; DRC

Funding

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R37MH044640, K05MH001891] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [R01AG017083] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NIA NIH HHS [R01 AG017083-06A1, R01 AG017083-07, R01 AG017083] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIMH NIH HHS [R37 MH044640-14, R37 MH044640-18, R37 MH044640-17, R37 MH044640, K05 MH001891, R37 MH044640-16, K05 MH001891-04, R37 MH044640-15, K05 MH001891-05] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Performance in the lexical decision task is highly dependent on decision criteria. These criteria can be influenced by speed versus accuracy instructions and word/nonword proportions. Experiment I showed that error responses speed up relative to correct responses under instructions to respond quickly. Experiment 2 showed that responses to less probable stimuli are slower and less accurate than responses to more probable stimuli. The data from both experiments support the diffusion model for lexical decision [Ratcliff, R., Gomez, P., & McKoon, G. (2004a). A diffusion model account of the lexical decision task. Psychological Review, 111, 159-182]. At the same time, the data provide evidence against the popular deadline model for lexical decision. The deadline model assumes that nonword responses are given only after the word response has timed out-consequently, the deadline model cannot account for the data from experimental conditions in which nonword responses are systematically faster than word responses. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available