4.7 Article

Pore structure control of PVDF membranes using a 2-stage coagulation bath phase inversion process for application in membrane distillation (MD)

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
Volume 452, Issue -, Pages 470-480

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.11.036

Keywords

PVDF; Dual coagulation bath; Membrane wetting; Membrane distillation; Membrane fabrication; Phase inversion

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Polyvinylidenefluoride (PVDF) membranes were fabricated using non-solvent assisted phase inversion technique (NIPS) to ultimately create a membrane distillation (MD) membrane. No pore forming additives were employed, in order to maintain the pore size distribution (PSD) as narrow as possible. Instead, a 2-stage coagulation bath system was used. The effects of the CB temperature, immersion time, polymer solution concentration, and thickness of the casted PVDF membranes were investigated. Prospective membranes with a uniform and open structure on the surface and an asymmetric interconnected pore structure all through the thickness of the membranes were obtained. A narrow PSD (0.14-0.2 mu m) along with a high liquid entry pressure (LEP) range 420-570 kPa and porosity values ranging from 57% to 79% were observed in the fabricated membranes, with a contact angle variance from 100 degrees to 127 degrees. The synergy of hydrophobicity, mechanical strength, high LEP and a very narrow PSD made the fabricated membranes suitable candidates for MD applications. Direct Contact (DCMD) and Vacuum MD (VMD) testing using these membranes were then carried out to analyze and understand their operational MD performance. The membranes were found to yield acceptable water vapor flux in MD and a narrower PSD than commercial PVDF membranes with similar nominal pore size. The salt rejection achieved was lower than expected, which was explained based on pore wetting. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available