4.7 Article

Pure- and mixed-gas CO2/CH4 separation properties of PIM-1 and an amidoxime-functionalized PIM-1

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
Volume 457, Issue -, Pages 95-102

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.01.055

Keywords

Gas separation; CO2/CH4 mixed-gas permeation; Intrinsic microporosity; Amidoxime; Functionalized PIMs

Funding

  1. King Abdullah University of Science and Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The prototypical solution-processable polymer of intrinsic microporosity, PIM-1, and derivatives thereof offer combinations of permeability and selectivity that make them potential candidate materials for membrane-based gas separations. Paramount to the design and evaluation of PIMs for economical natural gas sweetening is a high and stable CO2/CH4 selectivity under realistic, mixed-gas conditions. Here, amidoxime-functionalized PIM-1 (AO-PIM-1) was prepared and examined for fundamental structure/property relationships. Qualitative NLDFT pore-size distribution analyses of physisorption isotherms (N-2 at -196 degrees C; CO2 at 0 degrees C) reveal a tightened microstructure indicating size-sieving ultra-microporosity ( < 7 angstrom). AO-PIM-1 demonstrated a three-fold increase in alpha(D)(CO2/CH4) over PIM-1, surpassing the 2008 upper bound with P(CO2)= 1153 Barter and ideal alpha(CO2/CH4)=34. Under a 50:50 CO2:CH4 mixed-gas feed, AO-PIM-1 showed less selectivity loss than PIM-1, maintaining a mixed-gas alpha (CO2/CH4) similar to 21 across a 20 bar pressure range. Conversely, PIM-1 endured up to 60% increases in mixed-gas CH4 permeability over pure-gas values concurrent with a selectivity of only similar to 8 at 20 bar. A pervasive intermolecular hydrogen bonding network in AO-PIM-1 predominantly yields a rigidified microstructure that mitigates CO2-induced matrix dilations, reducing detrimental mixed-gas CH4 copermeation. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available