4.7 Article

Effectiveness-mass transfer units (ε-MTU) model of a reverse osmosis membrane mass exchanger

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
Volume 458, Issue -, Pages 189-198

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.01.039

Keywords

Mass exchanger; Reverse osmosis; Desalination; Effectiveness-mass transfer units; Concentration polarization; Heat and mass transfer similarity

Funding

  1. King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia through the Center for Clean Water and Clean Energy at MIT
  2. KFUPM
  3. National Science Foundation [1122374]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A strong analogy exists between heat exchangers and osmotic mass exchangers. The effectiveness number of transfer units (epsilon-NTU) method is well-known for the sizing and rating of heat exchanger A similar method, called the effectiveness-mass transfer units (epsilon-MTU) method, is developed for reverse osmosis (RO) mass exchangers. Governing equations for an RO mass exchanger are nondimensionalized assuming ideal membrane characteristics and a linearized form of the osmotic pressure function for seawater. A closed form solution is found which relates three dimensionless groups: the number of mass transfer units, which is an effective size of the exchanger: a pressure ratio, which relates osmotic and hydraulic pressures; and the recovery ratio, which is the ratio of permeate to inlet teed Bow rates. A novel performance parameter, the effectiveness of an RO exchanger, is defined as a ratio of the recovery ratio to the maximum recovery ratio. A one-dimensional numerical model is developed to correct for the effects of feed-side external concentration polarization and nonlinearities in osmotic pressure as a function of salinity. A comparison of model results to experimental data found in the literature resulted in an average error of less than 7.8%. The analytical epsilon-MTU model can be used for design or performance evaluation of RO membrane mass exchangers. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available