4.7 Article

Evaluation of flow fields on bubble removal and system performance in an ammonium bicarbonate reverse electrodialysis stack

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
Volume 446, Issue -, Pages 449-455

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.06.019

Keywords

Reverse electrodialysis; Gas management; Diffusion boundary layer resistance; Fluid flow field design; Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DGE0750756]
  2. King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) [KUS-I1-003-13]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ammonium bicarbonate has recently been demonstrated to be art excellent thermolytic solution for energy generation in reverse electrodialysis (RED) stacks. However, operating RED stacks at room temperatures can promote gaseous bubble (CO2, NH3) accumulation within the stack, reducing overall system performance. The management and minimization of bubbles formed in RED flow fields is an important operational issue which has yet to be addressed. Flow fields with and without spacers in RED stacks were analyzed to determine how both fluid flow and the buildup and removal of bubbles affected performance. In the presence of a spacer, the membrane resistance increased by similar to 50 Omega, resulting in a decrease in power density by 30% from 0.140 W m(-2) to 0093 W m(-2). Shorter channels reduced concentration polarization affects, and resulted in 3-23% higher limiting current density. Gas accumulation was minimized through the use of short vertically aligned channels, and consequently the amount of the membrane area covered by bubbles was reduced from similar to 20% to 7% which caused a 12% increase in power density. As ammonium bicarbonate RED systems are scaled up, attention to channel aspect ratio, length, and alignment will enable more stable performance. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available