4.7 Article

A new neodymium-doped BaZr0.8Y0.2O3-δ as potential electrolyte for proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
Volume 415, Issue -, Pages 391-398

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.05.062

Keywords

Solid oxide fuel cells; Proton conductor; Yttrium-doped barium zirconate; Sinterability

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of China [51025209]
  2. Program for New Century Excellent Talents
  3. Outstanding Young Scholar Grant at Jiangsu Province [2008023.]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chemically stable BaZr0.8Y0.2O3-delta (BZY) oxide is limited to applications as an electrolyte for solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) because of its poor sintering behavior. This study attempts to improve the sinterability and conductivity of BZY using the partial substitution of Zr4+ in BZY with Nd3+. An oxide with the nominal composition of BaZr0.7Nd0.1Y0.2O3-delta (BZNY) is specifically investigated. Results from X-ray diffraction (XRD) demonstrate Nd3+ is successfully doped into the lattice as anticipated and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) characterizations verify the morphology and crystal structure of the BZNY powder. Dilatometric measurement and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observations provide verification that the sinterability of the oxide is effectively improved by introducing Nd3+. XRD and CO2-TPD results demonstrate that BZNY is relatively stable with respect to the CO2 atmosphere. The total conductivity of BZNY in wet H-2 is 2.76 x 10(-3) S cm(-1) at 600 degrees C. An anode-supported thin-film BZNY electrolyte (similar to 30 mu m) cell is fabricated, and the electrolyte layer is found to be well densified after co-sintering with the anode substrate at 1450 degrees C for 5 h. The cell delivers a peak power density of 142 mW cm(-2) at 700 degrees C, higher than the reported values for a similar cell with BZY electrolyte. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available