4.7 Article

Impact of membrane configuration on fouling in anaerobic membrane bioreactors

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
Volume 382, Issue 1-2, Pages 41-49

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.07.042

Keywords

Bubbling; Scouring; Critical flux; Crossflow; Submerged; Sidestream

Funding

  1. European Community [MEST-CT-2005-021050]
  2. Severn Trent Water
  3. Yorkshire Water

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The filtration performance of flocculated and granulated configured anaerobic membrane bioreactors (MBR) treating domestic wastewater has been evaluated and compared to conventional aerobic MBR. Immersed hollow fibre (HF) and external tubular membrane geometries were additionally compared with the latter operated in both pumped and gas-lift mode. After 200d of operation, both granular and flocculated anaerobic MBR (AnMBR) suspensions were characterised by an increased population of colloidal particles while the aerobic MBR retained a unimodal particle size distribution with a d(50) of 20 mu m. Consequently, the flocculated AnMBR supernatant was characterised by a soluble microbial product (SMP) concentration ca. 500% higher than the aerobic MBR, such that the lowest critical fluxes for both HF and tubular membranes were recorded for the AnMBR. In comparison, the granulated AnMBR sludge was characterised by a low mixed liquor suspended solids concentration and an SMP concentration below 50% that of the flocculated anaerobic MBR. Consequently, similar fluxes to those of the aerobic MBR were achieved with the granulated anaerobic sludge using immersed HF membranes. Operating external tubular membranes in gas-lift appeared less effective for the granular AnMBR than the Aerobic MBR. However, critical fluxes >40 L m(-2) h(-1) were achieved using pumped mode. Results suggest granular AnMBR systems to be most suited to domestic wastewater treatment using either immersed HE membranes or external tubular membranes in pumped crossflow mode. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available