4.7 Article

Ultrafiltration optimization for the recovery of β-glucan from oat mill waste

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
Volume 373, Issue 1-2, Pages 53-63

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.02.032

Keywords

Ultrafiltration; Beta glucan; Dietary fiber; Polysaccharides; Macromolecules; Operational features

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The scope of the current study is to investigate the ultrafiltration process of high molecular weight beta-glucan molecules with a final purpose to optimize their recovery from oat mill waste. Therefore, standard beta-glucan solutions were processed in a dead-end cell using three types of membranes (regenerated cellulose, polyethersulfone and polysulfone) under several transmembrane pressures. Optimization was conducted by monitoring performance parameters and retention coefficients for each experimental combination. In terms of membrane type, polysulfone was selected as the most appropriate membrane material since it obtained satisfactory retention coefficient and performance parameter values when the beta-glucan concentration was less than 600 mg/L Thereafter, the polysulfone membrane was applied in a pilot cross-flow module instead of a dead-end cell. The retention of beta-glucan as well as the flux recovery was markedly improved with no important reduction of the permeate flux. Finally, polysulfone membrane was applied in the pilot cross-flow module for the ultrafiltration beta-glucan containing feeds (< 600 mg/L) recovered from the industrial oat mill waste. Results indicated that the optimized ultrafiltration process (polysulfone in cross-flow module, with transmembrane pressure <= 2 bar and beta-glucan concentrations < 600 mg/L) could be utilized in order to recover beta-glucan from the oat mill waste feeds and clarify them from smaller organic and inorganic compounds. A disadvantage of the latter application was the small degree of separation between beta-glucan and proteins. (C) 2011 Elsevier BM. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available