4.7 Article

Enhanced transport performance of sulfonated mesoporous benzene-silica incorporated poly(ether ether ketone) composite membranes for fuel cell application

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
Volume 351, Issue 1-2, Pages 58-64

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.01.028

Keywords

Fuel cell; Membrane; Mesoporous benzene-silica; PEEK; Proton conductivity

Funding

  1. Korean Science and Engineering Foundation (KOSEF) [R0A-2007-000-10029-0]
  2. Korean Government (MEST) [NRF-2009-0093033]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2007-0055824, 과C6A1904, R0A-2007-000-10029-0] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone) (sPEEK)/mesoporous benzene-silica electrolyte composite membranes were prepared using a solvent casting method. The two components were mixed thoroughly in N,N-dimethyl acetamide, at various concentrations up to 20 wt% of the mesoporous benzene-silica powder. The degree of sulfonation was 65% for sPEEK, and the ion-exchange capacity of mesoporous benzene-silica was 0.60 mequiv./g. The mesoporous benzene-silica material had a 2D hexagonal (p6mm) mesostructure with a pore diameter of 2.7 nm. The composite membranes exhibited higher proton conductivities than a pristine sPEEK membrane, and the proton conductivity increased with temperature. However, the sPEEK-based composite membranes showed very low methanol crossover below 5 x 10(-7) cm(2)/s, but this value was still in the same range as the pristine sPEEK membrane. A maximum proton conductivity of 0.079 S/cm was obtained for the sPEEK-OMB15 membrane at 80 degrees C, and the highest DMFC cell performance was at 56 mW/cm(2), which were approximately 119 and 37% increases compared to the pristine sPEEK membrane, respectively. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available