4.7 Article

Reverse osmosis membrane treatment of acidic etchant wastewater: Effect of neutralization and polyelectrolyte coating on nitrate removal

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
Volume 310, Issue 1-2, Pages 296-302

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2007.11.010

Keywords

mixed acid etchant wastewater; nitrate removal; reverse osmosis; membrane coating; polyelectrolyte

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The removal of nitrate from mixed acid etchant (MAE) wastewater was investigated by neutralization, followed by reverse osmosis (RO) membrane filtration. The coating of a RO membrane was conducted using polyacrylic acid (PAA) in order to enhance the removal of nitrate from the MAE wastewater. The addition of KOH, for the neutralization of the MAE wastewater, was most effective in terms of solid-liquid separation. Double RO filtrations, with crossflow and stirred-flow units, were examined in terms of nitrate rejection and membrane permeability. The Donnan exclusion, due to change in the solution pH, played an important role in nitrate rejection. As a result, RO filtration, at a moderate acidic pH level (e.g., pH similar to 4), provided greater nitrate rejection than that at neutral or alkaline pH levels. The Donnan effect was associated with acetic acid present in MAE wastewater, since it could deprotonate to acetate with a negative charge. Improvement in nitrate rejection occurred with the PAA coating of the original RO membrane. This is because of the enhanced electrostatic repulsion of the nitrate by the carboxyl groups on the coated membrane surface, although the flux declined with the PAA coatings. The effect of charge repulsion was more obvious in the second pass of RO filtration where the ionic strength was relatively low. The increase in nitrate rejection leveled off with a PAA dosage of 0.262 mg/cm(2) of the membrane, so further coating beyond this level should be prevented. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available